DR 10-0004 Reference missing from Scope

[Arms, Caroline]

The wording "Some of the differences" seems likely to raise more questions for a reader.  

I might replace 
"Some of the differences are reflected in schema changes, as shown in"
   by
"Differences in the schemas are shown in"

   Caroline


Caroline Arms
Library of Congress Contractor
Co-compiler of Sustainability of Digital Formats resource
http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/

** Views expressed are personal and not necessarily those of the institution **
________________________________________
From: Rex Jaeschke [rex at RexJaeschke.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 5:07 PM
To: SC 34 WG4
Subject: DR 10-0004  Reference missing from Scope

At the Tokyo Meeting 2010-09-06/08:

There was agreement to add text along the lines of that proposed. However, there were doubts as to whether such a thing can/should go in the Scope. Perhaps the Foreword is a better location. Also, as each Part has its own Scope, each Part affected by this (Parts 1, 2, and 4, apparently) should have its own note.

Action: Rex will investigate further and draft a resolution for review by the submitter (CH).

I have added proposed wording to the DR. See 10-0004<http://cid-c8ba0861dc5e4adc.office.live.com/view.aspx/Public%20Documents/2010/DR-10-0004.docx>. Let's discuss this on the next telcon, and once we agree on the words, I will send them along to the folks in CH.

Rex