Character repertoire checking for SML cells
MURATA Makoto
eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp
Tue Apr 5 17:10:06 CEST 2011
It is an optional attribute. It is present only when character
repertoire checking is
needed. I suppose that it is usually absent.
c elements already have other attributes. Do these attribute cause troubles?
attribute r { sml_ST_CellRef },
## default value: 0
attribute i { xsd:int }?,
## default value: false
attribute s { xsd:boolean }?,
## default value: false
attribute l { xsd:boolean }?,
## default value: false
attribute t { xsd:boolean }?,
## default value: false
attribute a { xsd:boolean }?
Regards,
Makoto
2011/4/5 Shawn Villaron <shawnv at microsoft.com>:
> By putting it on the c element, wouldn't that add considerably to the size of the file ( as well as parsing time, etc. )?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp]
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 1:10 AM
> To: SC34
> Subject: Character repertoire checking for SML cells
>
> I am wondering how we should attach CREPDL schemas to SML cells.
>
> Option A)
>
> 1) Introduce an attribute (say @c) to elements <c> in SML.
> This attribute is an ignorable attribute.
> 2) Introduce a new OPC part. The direct child elements of the
> root element are CREPL schemas, as specified in 19757-7.
> 3) The @c attrribute specify which of the direct child elements
> is used for the cell in question.
>
> Option B)
>
> 1 and 3) are the same as in A).
> 2) Introduce a new OPC part. Each direct child element of the root
> element references a CREPDL schema, which is another OPC part.
>
> Which do you think is better? Do we have to introduce relationship element (in sheetx.xml.rels) for each sheetx.xml?
>
> Regards,
> Makoto
>
>
--
Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
Makoto
More information about the sc34wg4
mailing list