Character repertoire checking for SML cells
Chris Rae
Chris.Rae at microsoft.com
Tue Apr 5 19:20:48 CEST 2011
Hi Murata-san - quick question - in your opinion, would this normally be applied to a range of cells (a whole sheet, or perhaps an area of a sheet) or just one single cell? If it's the former then I think it might be worth doing it in a similar way to cell formatting - if it's the latter then certainly an attribute on the cell is probably the right way to go.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com] On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto
Sent: 05 April 2011 08:10
To: SC34
Subject: Re: Character repertoire checking for SML cells
It is an optional attribute. It is present only when character repertoire checking is needed. I suppose that it is usually absent.
c elements already have other attributes. Do these attribute cause troubles?
attribute r { sml_ST_CellRef },
## default value: 0
attribute i { xsd:int }?,
## default value: false
attribute s { xsd:boolean }?,
## default value: false
attribute l { xsd:boolean }?,
## default value: false
attribute t { xsd:boolean }?,
## default value: false
attribute a { xsd:boolean }?
Regards,
Makoto
2011/4/5 Shawn Villaron <shawnv at microsoft.com>:
> By putting it on the c element, wouldn't that add considerably to the size of the file ( as well as parsing time, etc. )?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp]
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 1:10 AM
> To: SC34
> Subject: Character repertoire checking for SML cells
>
> I am wondering how we should attach CREPDL schemas to SML cells.
>
> Option A)
>
> 1) Introduce an attribute (say @c) to elements <c> in SML.
> This attribute is an ignorable attribute.
> 2) Introduce a new OPC part. The direct child elements of the
> root element are CREPL schemas, as specified in 19757-7.
> 3) The @c attrribute specify which of the direct child elements
> is used for the cell in question.
>
> Option B)
>
> 1 and 3) are the same as in A).
> 2) Introduce a new OPC part. Each direct child element of the root
> element references a CREPDL schema, which is another OPC part.
>
> Which do you think is better? Do we have to introduce relationship element (in sheetx.xml.rels) for each sheetx.xml?
>
> Regards,
> Makoto
>
>
--
Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
Makoto
More information about the sc34wg4
mailing list