Getting to grips with Custom XML

[Jesper Lund Stocholm]

Hello all,

Just to be clear: we are talking about "Structured Document Tags (Part 1
29500:2011, 17.5.2), right?



Med venlig hilsen / Best regards

Jesper Lund Stocholm

CIBER Danmark A/S
Mobil: +45 3094 5570
Email: jesper.stocholm at ciber.dk

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND NOTICE REGARDING NO ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE: The
materials in this electronic transmission (including attachments) may be
subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be private and
confidential and are the property of the sender. The information
contained is intended only for the named addressee(s) and should not be
considered evidence of intent to be bound to any agreement. The taking
of any action in reliance on the contents is strictly prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately
notify the sender and promptly delete this message.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Brown [mailto:alexb at griffinbrown.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 6:42 PM
> To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
> Subject: Getting to grips with Custom XML
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Should we be removing the Custom XML feature from OOXML? And if so
from
> Strict, or Transitional, or both?
> 
> Since this technology does not appear to be currently implemented, and
> seems unlikely to be implemented ever (I'd be keen to know if anybody
has
> information to the contrary) it serves no purpose in the standard -
and
> may in fact work against the interests of practical interoperability.
> 
> Perhaps this could be a topic for Discussion in Berlin?
> 
> - Alex.
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________