New document posted: IS 29500:2008-1/Amd2

[Arms, Caroline]

Rex,

On a quick skim, things look good.  I have one question/comment.  This is the amendment for Part 1.  The first list on page vi, the list of issues, includes one issue that is really only for Part 4.  It is certainly reasonable to list all the issues.  But if an issue relating to part 4 is listed, I would change the introductory sentence before the list of changes to refer specifically to Part 1 or possibly to change "this amendment addresses the issues" to "Amendments to ISO/IEC 29500-1 and 29500-4 address the issues".  

  Just a thought.   How many people have checked that all instances of the altered terminology have been found?  I don't propose to check if enough others have already done so.

     Caroline

Caroline Arms
Library of Congress Contractor
Co-compiler of Sustainability of Digital Formats resource
http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/

** Views expressed are personal and not necessarily those of the institution **
________________________________________
From: Rex Jaeschke [rex at RexJaeschke.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 2:48 PM
To: SC 34 WG4
Subject: New document posted: IS 29500:2008-1/Amd2

See http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/wg4/def/sc34-wg4-2010-0172.zip.

Rex Jaeschke
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34/WG4 Secretariat