New document posted: IS 29500:2008-1/Amd2

[Rex Jaeschke]

Thanks Caroline, I'll review it. Each Part's Amd should stand alone.

Rex


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arms, Caroline [mailto:caar at loc.gov]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 4:36 PM
> To: Rex Jaeschke; SC 34 WG4
> Subject: RE: New document posted: IS 29500:2008-1/Amd2
> 
> Rex,
> 
> On a quick skim, things look good.  I have one question/comment.  This is
the
> amendment for Part 1.  The first list on page vi, the list of issues,
includes one
> issue that is really only for Part 4.  It is certainly reasonable to list
all the
> issues.  But if an issue relating to part 4 is listed, I would change the
> introductory sentence before the list of changes to refer specifically to
Part 1
> or possibly to change "this amendment addresses the issues" to
> "Amendments to ISO/IEC 29500-1 and 29500-4 address the issues".
> 
>   Just a thought.   How many people have checked that all instances of the
> altered terminology have been found?  I don't propose to check if enough
> others have already done so.
> 
>      Caroline
> 
> Caroline Arms
> Library of Congress Contractor
> Co-compiler of Sustainability of Digital Formats resource
> http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/
> 
> ** Views expressed are personal and not necessarily those of the
institution
> ** ________________________________________
> From: Rex Jaeschke [rex at RexJaeschke.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 2:48 PM
> To: SC 34 WG4
> Subject: New document posted: IS 29500:2008-1/Amd2
> 
> See http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/wg4/def/sc34-wg4-2010-0172.zip.
> 
> Rex Jaeschke
> ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34/WG4 Secretariat
> 
> 
> 
>