Rewriting the scope of Part 3

[Jesper Lund Stocholm]

Hi Chris,



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Rae [mailto:Chris.Rae at microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 6:57 PM
> To: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given); SC34
> Subject: RE: Rewriting the scope of Part 3
> 
> Hi all - if I remember correctly, we do have a slight problem with
making
> MCE generic with regard to the suspension of MCE processing inside
extLst
> collections. I know we talked in Berlin about some possible ways to
get
> around that, but I don't think we settled on anything - I'd be
retiscent
> to head down the road of generalising MCE before that problem is
solved.
> 

Would a pragmatic solution be to generalise MCE and - ahem - 'extend' or
'augment' it in Part 1 and Part 4 of OOXML?


Med venlig hilsen / Best regards

Jesper Lund Stocholm

CIBER Danmark A/S
Mobil: +45 3094 5570
Email: jesper.stocholm at ciber.dk



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND NOTICE REGARDING NO ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE: The
materials in this electronic transmission (including attachments) may be
subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be private and
confidential and are the property of the sender. The information
contained is intended only for the named addressee(s) and should not be
considered evidence of intent to be bound to any agreement. The taking
of any action in reliance on the contents is strictly prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately
notify the sender and promptly delete this message.