SPAM-HIGH: Re: DR 11-0033, "WML: Positioning of Emphasis Marks" still not quite resolved to China's satisfaction

[Rex Jaeschke]

Based on Murata-san's comment about having closed this in Copenhagen, I will
mark it as such in the DR log.

Rex


-----Original Message-----
From: eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com] On Behalf Of MURATA
Makoto
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 7:51 PM
To: Li Ning
Cc: SC 34 WG4
Subject: SPAM-HIGH: Re: DR 11-0033, "WML: Positioning of Emphasis Marks"
still not quite resolved to China's satisfaction

Dear Ning,

Thank you for your interest in WG4 and this particular DR.

I declared a consensus in the Copenhagen meeting.  But China will have a
chance to comment on the upcoming DCOR during the DCOR ballot.  China might
want to try to provide compelling reasons for invalidating many existing
documents for the proposed name change.

Regards,
Makoto


2013/2/14 Alex Brown <alexb at griffinbrown.co.uk>:
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> We shouldn't make a breaking change by altering attribute names 
> without exceptionally good reason; I'm not seeing one here.
>
>
>
> - Alex.
>
>
>
> From: Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com]
> Sent: 13 February 2013 16:56
>
>
> To: SC 34 WG4
> Subject: DR 11-0033, "WML: Positioning of Emphasis Marks" still not 
> quite resolved to China's satisfaction
>
>
>
> Some time ago, we closed this DR and then re-opened it. Then last week 
> we closed it again. However, China still has some concerns. See below 
> an extract from private mail to me.
>
>
>
> While I sympathize with China's concerns, I think that their proposal 
> to change several enumerations' short names is a breaking change for 
> implementers. That said, standards are allowed to have breaking changes.
>
>
>
> Comments please.
>
>
>
> Rex
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Li Ning [mailto:lining at bistu.edu.cn]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:58 AM
> To: 'Rex Jaeschke'
>
>
>
> Dear Rex,
>
>
>
> I have read your draft minutes. I have a slight different opinion how 
> to explain the emphasis mark. As it may appear at different 
> positions(top, bottom, left, right), it is not a good idea to name it 
> as "underDot". I prefer to name it as "type-1" or "type-2". I made 
> some changes in the table in track mode, I think that you can understand
me well.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ning
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com 
> ______________________________________________________________________



-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto