答复: DR 11-0033, "WML: Positioning of Emphasis Marks" still not quite resolved to China's satisfaction

[Li Ning]

Dear all,

 

Although I made the same comment in July 2012, I can understand why it is
not adopted. Perhaps this is even not the right time to mention that again.
I can give up  if most of you think that my suggestion is unacceptable. 

The discussion is still valuable as many of us now have better understanding
about emphasis marks in different languages, it is more important than
naming the attributes, isn’t it? 

 

Best,

Ning

 

发件人: Alex Brown [mailto:alexb at griffinbrown.co.uk] 
发送时间: 2013年2月14日 2:42
收件人: Rex Jaeschke; SC 34 WG4
主题: RE: DR 11-0033, "WML: Positioning of Emphasis Marks" still not quite
resolved to China's satisfaction

 

Dear all,

 

We shouldn’t make a breaking change by altering attribute names without
exceptionally good reason; I’m not seeing one here.

 

- Alex.

 

From: Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com] 
Sent: 13 February 2013 16:56
To: SC 34 WG4
Subject: DR 11-0033, "WML: Positioning of Emphasis Marks" still not quite
resolved to China's satisfaction

 

Some time ago, we closed this DR and then re-opened it. Then last week we
closed it again. However, China still has some concerns. See below an
extract from private mail to me.

 

While I sympathize with China’s concerns, I think that their proposal to
change several enumerations’ short names is a breaking change for
implementers. That said, standards are allowed to have breaking changes.

 

Comments please.

 

Rex

 

 

 

 

From: Li Ning [mailto:lining at bistu.edu.cn] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:58 AM
To: 'Rex Jaeschke'

 

Dear Rex,

 

I have read your draft minutes. I have a slight different opinion how to
explain the emphasis mark. As it may appear at different positions(top,
bottom, left, right), it is not a good idea to name it as “underDot”. I
prefer to name it as “type-1” or “type-2”. I made some changes in the
table in track mode, I think that you can understand me well.

 

Best regards,

Ning

 


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20130214/821c8060/attachment.htm>