DR 13-0009, "Conformance and MCE"

[Francis Cave]

Thanks, Rex. I’m probably stating the obvious, but this is only one of a
number of changes that revision of Part 3 is likely to oblige us to make to
Part 1. We will certainly need to review those clauses in Part 1 that
mention MCE features, including §10 in its entirety and §17.17.3, §18.2.7,
§L.1.18.4 and §L.7.3.

 

Francis

 

 

 

From: Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com] 
Sent: 23 July 2013 22:52
To: SC 34 WG4
Subject: DR 13-0009, "Conformance and MCE"

 

With Francis’ permission, I have turned his proposal below into a new DR
(see attachment). That way, we can keep track of it separate from the Part 3
revision, which lead to his proposal.

 

Rex

 

 

 

 

From: Francis Cave [mailto:francis at franciscave.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 8:00 AM
To: SC 34/WG 4 mailing list
Subject: Revision of Part 3 - Impact upon Part 1 Clause 2.1 Conformance

 

Dear all

 

I have an action in the minutes of the Bellevue meeting to propose the
changes to Part 1 Clause 2.1 that would be necessitated by the
currently-proposed revisions to Part 3.

 

I propose the following changes to Part 1 §2.1:

 

In §2.1, third bulleted item, sub-item I, replace the entire current text
with: “The Part may contain markup in the Markup Compatibility namespace as
specified in ISO/IEC 29500-3”.

 

In §2.1, third bulleted item, sub-item ii, replace “using the mechanism”
with: “by an MCE processor as specified”

 

Regards,

 

Francis

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20130723/4c3cd8c5/attachment.html>