PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and 29500-4:2015 Posted to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by 2015-07-10

[Rex Jaeschke]

Thanks very much for your feedback Caroline. See in-line for my responses.

 

Rex

 

 

From: Arms, Caroline [mailto:caar at loc.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 4:06 PM
To: 'Rex Jaeschke'; SC 34 WG4
Cc: TC45
Subject: RE: PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and 29500-4:2015
Posted to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by 2015-07-10

 

Rex,

 

Here are checks of six of my ten DRs.  I'm afraid I did find 2 or 3
problems.

 

   To be continued.   Caroline

 

DR 14-004

 

CT_Font does appear to be defined at line 3797.  But the link in

18.8.22 still doesn't work.

 

Rex> Agreed; will fix.

 

If you look at the definition for CT_Fonts in A.2 (line 3484) its element
CT_Font doesn't link to anything either.  Same bad link in CT_Dxf.  Does
that indicate that a problem remains?

 

Rex> Agreed; will fix.

 

DR 13-004

  superseded by

DR 13-009  (edits are in N270)

  All looks OK (in Parts 1 and 4), assuming that the diagrams in deleted
clauses in L.7.3.4 are really deleted.  I believe they are but it will be
worth checking.

 

Rex> I'll check this when I adopt the changed.

 

DR 12-0012  OK

 

DR 09-0040  (complex font stuff!!!)

in 17.3.2.26, the added example is incorporated correctly, but I note that
it mentions the two-step algorithm, before the algorithm has been
introduced.  I would add "below" following "algorithm" in its first
occurrence in the Example.

 

Rex> Agreed; will fix.

 

Table entry on page 303 for cs (Complex Script Font)  is missing the
insertion of <w:cs /> in the sample markup

 

Rex> Agreed; will fix.

 

Same problem on 304 for

cstheme (Complex Script Theme Font)   is missing the insertion of

<w:cs /> in the sample markup

 

Rex> Agreed; will fix.

 

Everything else OK.

 

DR 12-0005

Replacement diagrams in 17.7.2 and 17.7.3 are not showing up properly in the
PDF.

 

Rex> Agreed; will fix.

 

DR 12-0003  OK

 

Caroline Arms

Library of Congress Contractor

Co-compiler of Sustainability of Digital Formats resource
http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/

 

** Views expressed are personal and not necessarily those of the institution
**

 

From: Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 11:58 AM
To: SC 34 WG4
Cc: TC45
Subject: PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and 29500-4:2015 Posted
to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by 2015-07-10

 

Some months ago, balloting ended on CORs for Parts 1 and 4 of 29500. Both
ballots passed.

 

I have applied the edits in each COR to the corresponding standard from 2012
to create a 2015 edition. As this new edition contains no new material
beyond what was adopted in the ballots, no further balloting is necessary;
this is an editorial task.

 

However, before I submit the final versions to ISO for publication, I'm
giving WG4 (and Ecma TC45) members a chance to review the final drafts to
make sure I applied all the edits correctly. In the case of Part 1, there
are some 250 sets of edits. I don't expect members to check all of them, but
if each member randomly chose 10 of them and checked those, we'll likely get
good coverage.

 

The changes are tracked, and both DOCX and PDF versions are included for
each Part. Don't be concerned if you see some bright blue edits, as they
will be "fixed" when I finally adopt the tracked changes.

 

Part 4 contains some manual pointers into Part 1, but these have not yet
been updated. I will do that once Part 1's tracked changes have been
adopted, and that Part is frozen.

 

I have posted to Livelink the 49-MB and 13-MB zip files as documents
2015-0309 and 2015-0310, respectively. Only registered members can access
these.

 

Rex Jaeschke, 29500 Project Editor

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20150708/098dd099/attachment.html>