PLEASE PROOF: Drafts of 29500-1/-4:2016; feedback due by the end of 2016-04-29

[Rex Jaeschke]

Thanks Caroline. See my replies inline.

Rex



-----Original Message-----
From: caroline arms [mailto:caroline.arms at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 8:15 AM
To: Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com>
Cc: SC 34 WG4 <e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org>; TC45 <e-TC45 at ecma-international.org>
Subject: Re: PLEASE PROOF: Drafts of 29500-1/-4:2016; feedback due by the end of 2016-04-29

Rex,

I've started looking at Part 4.

I noticed odd alignment in the ToC for Clause 16 in the PDF.  The same problem shows up in other clause ToCs.  Could be a problem related to tabs.  Shows up in .docx file too.  Alignment in 2012 files is better.

Rex> I presume you are referring to the embedded TOC in 16.2 where 16.6.1 through 16.6.9 have different indenting than 16.6.10->. I should be able to do something about that.



FWIW, I have checked Cor 2 for Part 4 (a single change) and that is fine.

Rex> Good.



    Caroline

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com> wrote:
> I just posted the following new documents to the WG4 website:
>
>
>
>         N 0333: 29500-1:2016 in DOCX and PDF, schemas and other electronic
> annexes [61MB]
>
>         N 0334: 29500-4:2016 in DOCX and PDF, schemas [12MB]
>
>
>
> These documents are 29500-1/-4:2012 with CORs 1 and 2 applied.
>
>
>
> Please post any corrections/suggestions to this list.
>
>
>
> About a year ago, we tried to publish 29500-1/-4:2015 after having 
> incorporated COR1, but as we found errors, we produced a COR2. I built 
> on last year s work by simply applying COR2 to what we already had. 
> That made some new changes and undid a few from COR1.
>
>
>
> For your convenience, CORs 1 and 2 are attached.
>
>
>
> I have applied all the editorial corrections reported (especially 
> those documented in the Beijing meeting minutes from 2015).
>
>
>
> I updated the Part 4 pointers into Part 1 to reflect clause-number changes.
>
>
>
> I ve asked Murata-san to get me the latest schemas, but as nothing was 
> changed in that regard for COR2, what I posted today should be the 
> final schemas.
>
>
>
> The review period ends on 2016-04-29. Hopefully, we can move these 
> drafts to DIS ballots during the 2016-05-10 teleconference. We already 
> got SC 34 s approval to do this at the Beijing Plenary. All being 
> well, the ISO and Ecma editions will be published before year s end.
>
>
>
> Rex
>
>
>
>