PLEASE PROOF: Drafts of 29500-1/-4:2016; feedback due by the end of 2016-04-29

[Rex Jaeschke]

See my replies inline. Rex


-----Original Message-----
From: caroline arms [mailto:caroline.arms at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 9:29 PM
To: Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com>
Cc: SC 34 WG4 <e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org>; TC45 <e-TC45 at ecma-international.org>
Subject: Re: PLEASE PROOF: Drafts of 29500-1/-4:2016; feedback due by the end of 2016-04-29

Continuing with Cor 1 against Part 1 draft

Item 110 doesn't appear to have been applied

Rex> Agreed; I'll fix that.



Item 111 looks OK

Item 112 looks OK.  I am happy with your editorial choice to add the note before the table rather than afterwards.

Rex> Actually, Item #3 of Cor2 directed the note go there.



Item 113 looks OK

Item 114 looks OK, although not all changes are indicated

Items 115-116 look OK

Item 117 look OK wrt Cor 1.  But reveals another grammar issue.
"There two" should be "There are two" in note at end of page 1913 (in
PDF)

Rex> Agreed; will fix.



Item 118-119 look OK

Item 120 looks OK, except for need to delete "at all" in attribute row for  connection

Rex> Agreed; will fix.



Item 121 looks OK

Item 122 looks OK.  Noticed small typo in "ISO 8601,  B.1.3 and  B2.3"
 Probably the second clause # should be  B.2.3 -- with an additional period.

Rex> Agreed; will fix.



Items 123-128 look OK


Item 129 look OK wrt Cor 1.  New issue:  "quotient from number-1 / number-2," should be "quotient from complex-number-1 / complex-number-2,"

Rex> Agreed; will fix.



Items 130-151 look OK

    Caroline