PLEASE PROOF: Proposed disposition of comments on the PDTR ballot for TR 30114-1 Extensions of Office Open XML File Formats -- Part 1 Guidelines

[caroline arms]

Rex and Murata-san,

I echo the thanks to Rex for his work putting this together.

On  KR 009, Murata-san says:
  'I like your option 3) for KR 009.  But I think that "\" should always be
"/".  Isn't it the case in the balloted text?'

I don't believe there is any other example of path segments in the
balloted text.

If we have to keep the "\" in the middle of “\_rels\.rels part”
because no-one brought it up in official comments, then I'd prefer to
go for Rex's option 2 -- which amounts to accepting the comment, I
believe.  If we can use "/" in the middle, then I would be happy with
Option 3 modified by Murata's wish always to use "/".

   Caroline

PS:  I will be on the call tomorrow.  However, I apologize in advance
for lack of preparation.  At rather short notice, I have a heavy
workload of preparation for Library of Congress activities that need
to be completed before the end of the government's fiscal year
(September 30).



On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:13 PM, MURATA Makoto
<eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp> wrote:
> Rex,
>
> Thank you for providing this proposed disposition.  I have better understanding
> of the phrase "The following"!
>
> I like your option 3) for KR 009.  But I think that "\" should always be
> "/".  Isn't it the case in the balloted text?
>
> Regards,
> Makoto
>
> 2016-07-15 4:27 GMT+09:00 Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com>:
>> The 2-month ballot on "TR 30114-1 Extensions of Office Open XML File Formats
>> -- Part 1 Guidelines" ended a few days ago, and, today, Kimura-san announced
>> the results in a posting to the SC 34 website (which I have included here).
>>
>> Earlier today, during the WG4 teleconference, I took an action item to
>> propose WG4's response, known formally as the "Disposition of Comments".
>> Attached is the ballot results document, the ballot comments with my
>> proposed dispositions to each, and the TR itself, with my recommendations
>> applied as tracked changes.
>>
>> No countries voted NO, and the comments were of a general or editorial
>> nature.
>>
>> I rejected one comment, I need help with one comment, and the rest I
>> accepted.
>>
>> Let's wrap this up before the next teleconference (2016-08-25), so on that
>> call, we can agree to ship the corrected version to Kimura-san (and ISO) for
>> publication.
>>
>> Thanks, Rex
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
>
> Makoto