Proposed changes for DR 15-0021

[caroline arms]

Looking at ISO/IEC 29500-1:2016 (dated April 2016) I see "The
pubBrowser attribute on the htmlPubPr element (Part 4, §11.2.1.1) was
renamed target."

I'm not quite sure why a Part 4 change was mentioned in Part 1, but
that's not my concern for this proposed change.  Should this DR
solution use "target" instead of "pubBrowser"?

BTW, I will only be able to be on tomorrow's call for the first hour.

     Caroline

On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 7:07 PM, MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp> wrote:
> Caroline,
>
> Thank you for your comments.  As you wrote, this requires another DR.
>
> UK has always argued that Part 1 must not reference Part 4.  Now,
> Part 1 does not have a normative reference to Part 4.  It does not
> even have Part 4 in the bibliography.
>
> Nevertheless, Primer in Part 1 has transitional features.  Should we move
> that part of the Primer to Part 4?  Or , should we introduce Part 4 in the
> Bibliography?  I would like to have another DR and discuss in the Seattle
> F2F.
>
> For now, I would like to close this DR by introducing changes required
> for dropping the complex type CT_HtmlPublishProperties.  To do so, I think
> that
> we need the schema changes in
>
> https://app.assembla.com/spaces/IS29500/subversion/commits/334
> https://app.assembla.com/spaces/IS29500/subversion/commits/335
>
> and the attached change to L.3.1.4.1, Part 1
>
> Regards,
> Makoto
>
> 2016-10-29 20:51 GMT+09:00 caroline arms <caroline.arms at gmail.com>:
>>
>> Murata-san,
>>
>> I've been looking at the textual changes you suggest.  I agree with
>> your textual deletions.
>>
>> Background: As far as I can see, the HTML Publishing Properties
>> (htmlPubPr) element was moved to Part 4 (and dropped from Part 1).  So
>> clearly it makes sens to drop its complexType.  I'll rely on others to
>> check the schema changes.
>>
>> Reading the entire Primer subclause L.3.1.4.1 made me wonder whether
>> more changes to the text are warranted, given that it refers to
>> features in Part 4.  We do have other instances where discussion in
>> the Primer refers to features now in Part 4.  See the last sentence in
>> L.5.2, which is about VML.
>>
>> At the very least, the "must" in the first paragraph seems jarring.
>> The paragraph now reads:
>> "An implementation must have the ability to save (and publish) a
>> presentation to a web-friendly format like HTML or MHTML. Various
>> parameters are used to configure the application for saving such
>> formats as well as to control what content gets generated.  The
>> parameters that configure the application are the HTML Publish
>> properties whereas the content properties are the Web Properties."
>>
>> What about the following:
>>
>> Change "must have" to "might provide"
>> Change "parameters are used" to "parameters are available"
>> Add reference to Part 4 in a sentence modeled after the last sentence in
>> L.5.2.
>> Move last sentence in existing paragraph to a new paragraph.
>>
>> The result would be:
>> "An implementation might provide the ability to save (and publish) a
>> presentation to a web-friendly format like HTML or MHTML. Various
>> parameters are available to configure the application for saving such
>> formats as well as to control what content gets generated.  These
>> parameters are introduced here.  For details, see the section on
>> PresentationML in Part 4.
>>
>> The parameters that configure the application are the HTML Publish
>> properties whereas the content properties are the Web Properties."
>>
>> I realize that this suggestion may need a new DR.
>>
>> Also, the Primer implies that this element/complexType is in PML,
>> rather than DML.  So the DR Title should possibly be changed.
>>
>> Hope this helps.
>>
>> Caroline
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 3:26 AM, MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp>
>> wrote:
>> > Folks,
>> >
>> >
>> > Here is my proposal.  I hope to close this DR in
>> > the next teleconference.
>> >
>> > Schema changes
>> >
>> > https://app.assembla.com/spaces/IS29500/subversion/commits/334
>> > https://app.assembla.com/spaces/IS29500/subversion/commits/335
>> >
>> > Changes to L.3.1.4.1, Part 1
>> >
>> > Remove the paragraph "Indirectly", schema fragments,
>> > and the last paragraph of this subclause.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Makoto
>
>
>
>