Resolution to pointers to "AlternateContent Blocks" in the Part 1 Primer

[caroline arms]

Thanks.  Not surprisingly, I'm happy with that!

Just noticed that the normative reference to 29500-3 is the 2011
version in my copy of the new Part 1.  Can we update that at this
point?  Maybe that was caught earlier.

   Thanks again.   Caroline

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com> wrote:
> In her feedback on the Part 1 COR integration, Caroline wrote the following:
>
>
>
> “[Cor. 1] Items 258-261 look OK.  However, I notice that by deleting all
> these subclauses, clauses L.7.3. and L.7.3.4 become problematic, because
> they assume 7.3.4.2 is present and don't make sense without some discussion
> of Alternate Content Blocks.  Would it be acceptable at this stage to create
> a new 7.3.4.2 that simply refers to Part 3?”
>
>
>
> During last week’s teleconference, the minutes show the following:
>
>
>
> Rex>I’ll make these dangling places point to Part 3, and check with
> Caroline.
>
>
>
> Having studied the problem, I’ve decided to go with her suggestion.
>
>
>
> I’ve reinstated the AlternateContent Blocks subclause heading only, and
> under that I’ve added, “For information on this topic, refer to IS 29500-3.”
>
>
>
> Rex
>
>