My personal draft based on WD 3.1 (OPC)

[caroline arms]

Murata-san,

I should soon have a few hours to review your latest draft of Part 2.
Is the link in this email still the right one?

    Thanks.   Caroline

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:16 AM, MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp> wrote:
> Dear collegues,
>
> I created my personal draft based on WD 3.1.
>
> It is available at:
> https://www.assembla.com/spaces/IS29500/documents/dNZ1eWArer5OkDacwqEsg8/download/dNZ1eWArer5OkDacwqEsg8
>
> Here is a list of changes.
>
> Throughout
>
> "relationships part" -> "Relationships part"
> "non-relationships part" -> "part that is not a Relationships part"
>
> 3. Terminology
>
> I deleted "part relationship" from Clause 3, since
> we already have "relationship, part" in this clause.
>
> 5.2 Diagram notes
>
> Since we decided not to rely on diagrams in Prague,
> I deleted this subclause.
>
> 8.5.2 Relationships Part
>
> Rewrote based on my email "Rewrite for not using "source
> of a Relationships part".  In WD 3.1, we used the term
> "the source of a relationship" and "the source of a
> Relationship part".  This rewrite removes the second.
>
> 8.5.3.2 Relationships Elemeent
>
> Added a note about the schema.
>
> 8.5.3.3 Relationship Elemeent
>
> Added a note about the schema.
>
> 9.2.3.2.2 Types
>
> I deleted diagrams, rewrote attribute tables using the
> Part 1/4 style, and added some prose instead of the
> diagrams.
>
> 9.2.3.2.3 Default
>
> Ditto.
>
> 9.2.3.2.4 Override
>
> Ditto.
>
> Annex I
>
> In Prague, as part of the DR 13-0002 discussions,
> we agreed to introduce another annex.
>
> Re Murata-san’s mail of 2016-06-08, “Let me try again: DR
> 13-0002”, re “Guidelines for Format Designers” (see
> https://goo.gl/gzIX9y) we agreed to spin off this proposal
> from this DR’s resolution, and to make it a new (informative)
> annex. Murata-san will revise it to change the
> “allow/disallow” phrases to “should specify whether they
> allow or disallow”. Later, he’ll add text for digital
> signatures.
>
> I introduced a slightly revised version of the proposed annex.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Makoto