PLEASE PROOF: WD3.3 of 29500-2, OPC

[MURATA Makoto]

OK.  I will try to resolve more comments by the teleconf.

Regards
Makoto

2018-01-11 7:02 GMT+09:00 Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com>:

> I just spoke with Aarti about this spec, and here is our latest thinking:
>
>
>
> Given that there is a lot to do yet with this spec, and that Aarti will
> only get one detailed review from her internal people, we’ll need a far
> cleaner spec before she can ask them to look at it. And by my estimate,
> that won’t happen until at least after the March F2F meeting.
>
>
>
> So, I propose that I give ownership of the spec back to Murata-san, so he
> can address more of the issues raised in the comments. Then we refine the
> spec further on the next teleconference.
>
>
>
> If coming out of the March F2F, the spec is in very good shape, we might
> be able to have a 2-month CD ballot before the September F2F.
>
>
>
> Rex
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 9, 2018 3:46 PM
> *To:* SC 34 WG4 (e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org) <e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-
> international.org>
> *Subject:* PLEASE PROOF: WD3.3 of 29500-2, OPC
>
>
>
> Attached is WD3.3 of the OPC Spec.
>
>
>
> Once I got it back from Murata-san, here’s what I did:
>
>
>
>    1. I adopted all edits from WD3.2 and prior that had been resolved, so
>    they no longer show as tracked changes.
>    2. I kept all the comments that do not appear to have been resolved.
>    3. All Murata-san’s edits proposed since WD3.2 are shown as tracked
>    changes.
>
>
>
> I propose that at the March F2F meeting, we walk through this document and
> accept/reject the proposed edits, and resolve the issues raised in comments.
>
>
>
> Our most-recent discussion of a time line for this spec was to have a
> complete version at the end of the March 2018 meeting, and after minor
> changes from the F2F meeitng, to send it out for a 2-month CD ballot,
> closing before the June F2F. I now think this is quite unrealistic. There
> is a lot of work to do yet, and the decisions we make in March will need to
> be applied to the spec and then reviewed in the following teleconferences.
> We migth have a shot at getting a near-final draft for review of the June
> meeting.
>
>
>
> Murata-san has long pushed to get rid of informative Annex G [formerly H],
> “Guidelines for Meeting Conformance”, while I pushed for keeping it. And
> while we agreed to keep it, it still needed serious work to make it
> complete. Unfortunately, in its current state, many of its links and
> bookmarks are now badly broken, and will be non-trivial to reconstruct. So,
> reluctantly, I am dropping my objection to removing this Annex. As such, I
> have **not** done any work on repairing/updating this annex. If we drop
> this annex, we’ll need to decide what to do about all the [M], [O], and [S]
> markers spread throughout the normative text.
>
>
>
> In DR 13-0002, Murata-san proposed the addition of a new informative
> Annex, “Guidelines for Format Designers” (see https://goo.gl/gzIX9y)”. As
> I cannot access this link, I have not added this annex. Murata-san, can you
> please circulate this proposed text?
>
>
>
> As Caroline will likely not attend the March meeting, I’d like to give her
> time to review and submit feedback before then. Likewise for Aarti’s
> experts (who likely will not attend that meeting).
>
>
>
> We’ll have a big job in March resolving all the open issues, so the more
> preparation you can do before then, the better. And, of course, we can do
> serious work on this on our January 31 teleconference.
>
>
>
> Rex
>
>
>



-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20180113/b253cce2/attachment.html>