DR 19-0004: custShow

[MURATA Makoto]

Folks,

I agree with Francis.

In the schemas, we have two different elements having the same name.
One is a child of the showPr element.  It has the id attribute and
nothing else.  The other is a child of the custShowLst element.  It
has sldLst and extLst child elements as well as the name and id
attribute.  19.2.1.5 is for the former while 19.2.1.6 is for the
latter.

The example in 19.2.1.5 is a mistake.  It is actually an example for
19.2.1.6 and should be moved to 19.2.1.6.  An example in 19.2.1.5 is
already shown in the log for DR 19-0004.

We can close this issue very soon.

Regards,
Makoto

2019年1月25日(金) 1:15 Francis Cave <francis at franciscave.com>:

> During yesterday’s telecon we briefly discussed DR 19-0004, specifically
> two elements with the same name, custShow, in consecutive sub-sections of
> Part 1: §19.2.1.5 and §19.2.1.6. I agreed to investigate further and in
> particular to check the MS Office implementer notes.
>
>
>
> The implementer notes do not mention either of these elements.
>
>
>
> After further investigation I think that what is required is as follows:
>
>
>
>    - Revise the text of §19.2.1.5 as specified in DR 19-0004 (note that
>    this includes a new example, which isn’t clear in the DR).
>    - Replace the example in current text of §19.2.1.6 with the example in
>    the current of §19.2.1.5, which is a much better example.
>
>
>
> If this is done, the prose will align with the schema.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Francis
>
>
> Click here <https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/MZbqvYs5QwJvpeaetUwhCQ==> to
> report this email as spam.
>
>
> This message has been scanned for malware by Forcepoint.
> www.forcepoint.com
>


-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20190126/56cd1135/attachment.html>