DCOR 2 comments

Francis Cave francis at franciscave.com
Wed May 4 10:28:52 CEST 2011

Dear members of WG 6

Having discussed with the Project Editor, Patrick Durusau, the outcome of
the discussions both at our last teleconference meeting and the subsequent
OASIS ODF TC meeting, Patrick and I have agreed that the dispositions of
comments that I proposed at the last meeting are fit to be forwarded to the
SC 34 Secretariat for circulation.

The final text of COR2 that will be submitted to ITTF is attached. It may of
course be subject to minor editorial and formatting changes by ITTF prior to
publication. The changes made to the final text are to correct the page and
line reference errors and to remove references to Defect Reports and an
associated Note.

The dispositions of comments are as follows:

DE1: Accepted - Replace '"Condition", page , line' with '"Condition", page
210, line 42'

DE2: Accepted - Replace '"Extrusion Second Light Harsh", page , line' with
'"Extrusion Second Light Harsh", page 329, line 1'

DE3: Accepted - Replace '"Extrusion First Light Harsh", page 328, line'
with'"Extrusion First Light Harsh", page 328, line 35'

JP1: Accepted - In order to maintain alignment between ISO/IEC 26300:2006
and ODF v1.0 it is proposed to make this correction in Amendment 1, and make
a corresponding correction in the ODF v1.1 Errata for alignment. No change
to this Technical Corrigendum.

Francis Cave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: robert_weir at us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir at us.ibm.com]
> Sent: 03 May 2011 01:14
> To: francis at franciscave.com
> Cc: sc34wg6 at vse.cz
> Subject: DCOR 2 comments
> Hello Francis,
> At our ODF TC call today we reviewed the NB DCOR2 ballot comments.  Our
> analysis and recommendations follow.
> For the comments from DIN, on the page and line number references,
> these
> concern defects in the editing instructions as presented in the DCOR
> text.
>  The OASIS Errata do not have these defects since the OASIS
> presentation
> of the editing instructions was different.  Since the underlying
> corrections made by the DCOR2 editing instructions are correct. we
> recommend that the Project Editor supply the missing page and line
> numbers
> for these items in the published corrigenda.
> The JISC comment, concerning the XSL reference in 15.4.19, does not
> appear
> to correspond to any submitted NB defect report on IS 26300,   Our
> understanding was that WG6 agreed previously that any additional defect
> reports on IS 26300 would be applied after the FPDAM.  We've been
> operating under this assumption in the ODF TC, and have made our ODF
> 1.1
> planning and editing work based on this understanding.  So rather than
> put
> the COR out of sync with the OASIS Errata by expanding the scope of the
> DCOR to include new defects, we recommend that we stick to the plan of
> synching on the amendment.  With that plan, the ODF TC would publish an
> Errata for ODF 1.1 that would reconcile the OASIS text to incorporate
> relevant changes from the published ODF 1.0 Errata, as well as any
> necessary changes based on FPDAM ballot comments.  The easiest way to
> ensure the Japan defect is addressed there is to submit that as an
> comment.  This could be done by Japan or by OASIS.   (This particular
> defect is already fixed in the ODF 1.,2 text).
> Regards,
> -Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: IS 26300-2006 COR 2 FINAL TEXT.odt
Type: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text
Size: 22446 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg6/attachments/20110504/2a477372/attachment-0001.odt>

More information about the sc34wg6 mailing list