Proposed draft for the DIS 30114-2

[MURATA Makoto]

Francis and Caroline,

Thank you for pointing out that MCE is not used anywhere in this
document.

Perhaps, we should reference Part 1 (PDTR) and further state
that we use foreign parts but do not use MCE?  Probably at
end of the Introduction?  Here is my
first cut.

As stated in TR 30114-1, there are two main ways to add extra markup
or other data to OOXML documents.  The first way is using the
extension mechanisms described in 29500-3, “Markup Compatibility and
Extensibility (MCE)”.  The second way is embedding foreign OPC parts.
This document uses the second way but does not use the first way.



I have accepted all other comments from Caroline.

Regards,
Makoto

2016-07-07 11:51 GMT+09:00 caroline arms <caroline.arms at gmail.com>:

> Murata-san,
>
> Here are a few things I noticed.
>
> *  Inconsistent use of non-breaking spaces and hyphens in numbers for
> ISO standards.  I see the non-breaking variants used in Normative
> References, but not elsewhere.  I noticed this because the built-in
> viewer in Firefox 47.0.1 for .doc files does not recognize the
> non-breaking hyphen character, closing 29500-1 into 295001.  This will
> be something to check for any conversion to PDF.
>
> *  3.1 looks to have a meaningless note, perhaps left over from the
> template.  It reads, "Note 1 to entry: Text of the note."
>
> *  It isn't clear to me what the curved arrow at the top of Figure 4.1
> is supposed to mean.
>
> *  4.3.3 has a page-break in the middle of the URI for a namespace.
>
> *  B.1   "This annex provides media types and relationship types used
> in this document." This statement seems odd, because they are not used
> in this document.  Perhaps "This annex provides media types and
> relationship types to be used for the OPC parts specified in this
> document."
>
> *  I agree with Francis that the Bibliography entry for 29500-3 is
> either unnecessary or needs some explanation.
>
>      Hope this helps.
>
>      Caroline
>
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 2:40 AM, MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp>
> wrote:
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> > Attached please find my proposed draft for the
> > DIS 30114-2.
> >
> > I find a conflict between the diagram for the relationships
> > used in this standard and the rest of this standard.  The
> > diagram has a relationship from Character Checking Condition
> > parts to to-be-validated parts.  But it is defined nowhere
> > in the rest.
> >
> > To address this conflict, I introduced a relationship type
> > in Annex B, and changed the markup for specifying the id of
> > the relationship.  I tracked the changes required for
> > addressing the conflict.
> >
> > This draft is based on a new templates from JTC1.  It is
> > linked at the bottom of this page:
> >
> >
> http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards_development/resources-for-technical-work.htm
> >
> > Using this template, I incorporated all changes agreed in
> > Prague.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Makoto
> >
>



-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20160710/efd45962/attachment.html>