Ballot result: ISO/IEC 26300:2006/DCOR2

Wed Apr 27 15:39:35 CEST 2011

Dear WG6

I believe it is the duty of the project editor to make the dispositions
of comments. Furthermore the disopsitioons of comments are due within
3 months of the ballot.

So we are doing this work under the authority of the project editor, and
he can decide to issue the disposition of comments and the resulting 
corrected document as he wishes, even today.

Furthermore I think it is in the interest of OASIS to have this document
progressed as quickly as possible. At least in Denmark, the COR2 is a vital
document for acceptance of ODF in the public sector - ODF was denied
recommendation in March 2011 because ODF 1.1 was not an ISO standard.
ODF will be reevaluated in October 2011. It would be essential that COR2
be approved at that time, and for that to happen, we need to send COR2
for ballot as quickly as possible.

I believe a similar situation is the case in Germany.

I note that there are no further meetings scheduled for WG6 so that we
can make adequate progress within the 3 month window that we have to
issue the DoC.

Given the nature of the comments, I really do not see a reason to delay
the process bheyond what should be done today.

Best regards
Keld

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:04:40PM +0100, Francis Cave wrote:
> Hi Rob
> 
> I was not proposing that we agree the Disposition of Comments today, but that we simply discuss them and discuss the timetable for finalising them and for issuing a final text of COR2 for publication. I fully accept that OASIS and National Body experts have not had time to review the results, and that a formal response to the Disposition of Comments will have to wait until experts have had time to review the document. I am simply anxious not to delay the process.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Francis
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: robert_weir at us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir at us.ibm.com]
> > Sent: 27 April 2011 12:55
> > To: francis at franciscave.com
> > Cc: sc34wg6 at vse.cz
> > Subject: Fw: Ballot result: ISO/IEC 26300:2006/DCOR2
> > 
> > Francis,
> > 
> > There is insufficient notice given of this document for OASIS to offer
> > any
> > feedback.  JTC1 calls for documents to be acted on to be made available
> > well before a meeting.  In this case we are receiving notice the day of
> > the meeting, or in the case of our US west coast members,  no notice at
> > all.
> > 
> > Our next ODF TC meeting will be Monday, May 2nd.  I'd be happy to
> > discuss
> > the ballot comments and proposed response with them at that time,and
> > come
> > to a informed position as a delegation to WG6.
> > 
> > I have no objections to discussing dispositions today, but I suggest
> > that
> > we do not formally approve dispositions at this time.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > -Rob
> > 
> > ----- Forwarded by Robert Weir/Cambridge/IBM on 04/27/2011 07:43 AM ---
> > --
> > 
> > sc34wg6-bounces at vse.cz wrote on 04/27/2011 06:25:33 AM:
> > 
> > > From: "Francis Cave" <francis at franciscave.com>
> > > To: "SC 34/WG 6 mailing list" <sc34wg6 at vse.cz>
> > > Date: 04/27/2011 06:30 AM
> > > Subject: RE: Ballot result: ISO/IEC 26300:2006/DCOR2
> > > Sent by: sc34wg6-bounces at vse.cz
> > >
> > > Proposed dispositions of comments:
> > >
> > > DE1: Accepted ??? replace ??????Condition???, page , line??? with
> > > ??????Condition???, page 210, line 42???
> > >
> > > DE2: Accepted ??? replace ??????Extrusion Second Light Harsh???, page ,
> > > line??? with ??????Extrusion Second Light Harsh???, page 329, line 1???
> > >
> > > DE3: Accepted ??? replace ??????Extrusion First Light Harsh???, page 328,
> > > line??? with??????Extrusion First Light Harsh???, page 328, line 35???
> > >
> > > JP1: Accepted ??? in order to maintain alignment between ISO/IEC
> > > 26300:2006 and ODF v1.0 it is proposed to make this correction in
> > > Amendment 1, and make a corresponding correction in the ODF v1.1
> > > Errata if necessary for alignment. Propose no change to this
> > > Technical Corrigendum.
> > >
> > > Francis Cave
> > > Convenor
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: sc34wg6-bounces at vse.cz [mailto:sc34wg6-bounces at vse.cz] On
> > Behalf
> > Of
> > > Francis Cave
> > > Sent: 27 April 2011 11:06
> > > To: SC 34/WG 6 mailing list
> > > Subject: Ballot result: ISO/IEC 26300:2006/DCOR2
> > >
> > > Dear members of WG 6
> > >
> > > The result of the ballot on ISO/IEC 26300:2006/DCOR2 is now
> > > available from the SC 34 document repository as document SC 34 N
> > > 1630. We will consider the results under agenda item 5 of today???s
> > > teleconference meeting.
> > >
> > > In summary, the results are that DCOR2 has been approved for
> > > publication. There were 19 approvals as presented, 2 approvals with
> > > comments, no disapprovals and 7 abstentions.
> > >
> > > We need to prepare a disposition of comments. Full details of the
> > > comments received are in N 1630.
> > >
> > > I can summarise the comments as follows:
> > >
> > > DE: Clause 8.5.3 ??? page and line numbers are missing at:
> > > ???Condition???, page , line
> > >
> > > DE: Clause 9.5.2 ??? page and line numbers are missing at: ???Extrusion
> > > Second Light Harsh???, page , line
> > >
> > > DE: Clause 9.5.2 ???line number is missing at: ???Extrusion First Light
> > > Harsh???, page 328, line
> > >
> > > JP: Clause 15.4.19 mistakenly references subsection 8.8.4 of XSL ???
> > > Add an editing instruction to Clause 15.4.19 to replace a reference
> > > to 8.8.4 of XSL by a reference to 7.8.4 of XSL.
> > >
> > > I will review these comments and propose dispositions when we reach
> > > this item in the agenda.
> > >
> > > Francis Cave
> > > Convenor_______________________________________________
> > > sc34wg6 mailing list
> > > sc34wg6 at vse.cz
> > > http://mailman.vse.cz/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg6
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sc34wg6 mailing list
> sc34wg6 at vse.cz
> http://mailman.vse.cz/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg6