Issues for the next 2 SC 34/WG4 calls, beyond what Murata-san had listed in his revised agenda

[Rex Jaeschke]

1.	DR 09-0216 was supposedly closed. However, after I posted my planned
response, there was a lot of email traffic about this DR. As we have not met
since then, we have not made a final decision on the resolution.  The Draft
CORs and AMDs do NOT include any text for this DR.

2.	On July 6, Rick Jelliffe wrote, ". the draft Amendment seems to use
only the old URIs for relationships. For example, change 98 (p21/ PDF p32)
s9.11.1 specifies extra linking relationships, but these are all in terms of
old relationship identifiers. For strict, these certain should use the new
relationship URIs." What specific changes do I need to make to fix this?
		
3.	DR 09-0157. We had agreed to close this (and the proposed solution
is in the draft docs); however, in subsequent mail I see a request to
re-open this topic, thereby removing it from the first COR/AMD set. We need
to decide on this.
		
Note that while I posted the DCORs and FPDAMs to the email list, they are
also available as WG4 documents N 0059 through 0064.

Rex


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20090715/f7798359/attachment.htm>