“content type” vs. “media type” terminology

[Jirka Kosek]

On 3.4.2015 15:37, MURATA Makoto wrote:
> I now think that "the Media Types stream" is better,
> We certainly cannot change the file name "[Content_Types].xml"
> but we can change this term.   Right?

Yes, I agree that media type is more proper term here.

			Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka at kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
     Professional XML and Web consulting and training services
DocBook/DITA customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bringing you XML Prague conference    http://xmlprague.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20150403/4bbd3939/attachment.asc>