Another DCOR immediately? (Fwd: PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and 29500-4:2015 Posted to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by 2015-07-10

Sun Jul 19 12:31:14 CEST 2015

This error is serious.  Do we want to publish consolidated
text anyway or should we create another DCOR immediately
and then publish consolidated text?

Regards,
Makoto

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp>
Date: 2015-07-15 19:39 GMT+09:00
Subject: Re: PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and 29500-4:2015
Posted to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by 2015-07-10
To: SC 34 WG4 <e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org>

It appears that at least a table and four figures in the agreed DR 12-0025
log
has not been correctly incorporated in the DCOR and thus the consolidated
text.    Sine these errors exist in the DCOR, I am afraid that we have to
submit another DR and wait for the next revision.

The table in #49 of the COR differs from that in the DR Log.
The figure in #50 of the COR differs from that in the DR Log.
The figure in #245 of the COR differs from that in the DR Log.
The figure in #246 of the COR differs from that in the DR Log.
The figure in #252 of the COR differs from that in the DR Log.

So far, I have only compared the COR and the consolidated text.  But
this example indicates that we should have more carefully compared
the DR log and the COR.

Regards,
Makoto

2015-07-13 3:55 GMT+09:00 Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com>:

> #216
>
>
>
> Agreed; that sentence was in the COR but not in the consolidated draft.
> I’ll add it.
>
>
>
> #222
>
>
>
> I agree, I got it wrong in the XSD, but right in the RelaxNG. I’ll fix
> that.
>
>
>
> Rex
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *MURATA
> Makoto
> *Sent:* Sunday, July 12, 2015 6:36 AM
>
> *To:* SC 34 WG4
> *Subject:* Re: PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and
> 29500-4:2015 Posted to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by
> 2015-07-10
>
>
>
> #216
>
>
> A sentence should be added to the first para.
>
>
>
>  This value is used as one piece of information to guide selection of a
> similar alternate font if the
>
> desired font is unavailable.
>
>
>
> #222
>
>
>
> The default value is not "nlCheck" but "off"
>
>
>
> #222 is my last so far.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Makoto
>
>
>
> 2015-07-11 8:21 GMT+09:00 John Haug <johnhaug at exchange.microsoft.com>:
>
> Rex, if you don’t mind ignoring your request for comments by tomorrow, I
> can look at some of these next week.
>
>
>
> Which items did you review, Murata-san?  You said you started with #146
> (18.17.7.242, I believe) and the highest number you commented on is #198.
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> *From:* Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 9, 2015 12:33 PM
> *To:* 'SC 34 WG4'
> *Subject:* RE: PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and
> 29500-4:2015 Posted to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by
> 2015-07-10
>
>
>
> See my responses in-line. I disagree with one and don’t understand one
> other.
>
>
>
> Rex
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com <eb2mmrt at gmail.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *MURATA Makoto
> *Sent:* Friday, July 3, 2015 9:27 AM
> *To:* SC 34 WG4
> *Subject:* Re: PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and
> 29500-4:2015 Posted to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by
> 2015-07-10
>
>
>
> #198
>
>
>
> This change was correctly incorporated, but the indentation in the
>
> consolidated Part 1 is too much.
>
>
>
> Rex> Agreed; will fix.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Makoto
>
>
>
>
>
> 2015-07-03 17:25 GMT+09:00 MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp>:
>
> Rex,
>
>
>
> I began with #146 of Part1.  I will send more.
>
>
>
> #152
>
>
>
> The second bullet in #152 in the COR to Part 1 lacks a verb "is".
>
> Although this does not exist in the COR, I think that this
>
> editorial error can be fixed.
>
>
>
> Rex> Agreed; will fix.
>
>
>
> #155
>
>
>
> The COR is correct, but the consolidated text does not
>
> incorporate this change.
>
>
>
> Rex> Disagree; I see the fix applied in both the DOCX and PDF versions.
>
>
>
> #169
>
>
>
> This change was correctly incorporated, but the layout
>
> is broken. See 18.17.7.342 in Part 1.
>
>
>
> Rex> Agreed; the trailing newline should be restored. Will fix.
>
>
>
> #174-176
>
>
>
> "unit face value" should be replaced by "units face value".
>
>
>
> Rex> Agreed; will fix.
>
>
>
> #177
>
>
>
> This change was correctly incorporated, but the layout
>
> is broken. See 18.17.7.356 in Part 1.
>
>
>
> Rex> Agreed; the trailing newline should be restored. Will fix.
>
>
>
> #187
>
>
>
> Is *notes*Master actually a notes master?  This is for
>
> both the DCOR text and the consolidated text.
>
>
>
> Rex> I don’t understand your question. Are your suggesting the DR
> resolution in this regard is incorrect?
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Makoto
>
>
>
>
>
> 2015-06-04 0:58 GMT+09:00 Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com>:
>
> Some months ago, balloting ended on CORs for Parts 1 and 4 of 29500. Both
> ballots passed.
>
>
>
> I have applied the edits in each COR to the corresponding standard from
> 2012 to create a 2015 edition. As this new edition contains no new material
> beyond what was adopted in the ballots, no further balloting is necessary;
> this is an editorial task.
>
>
>
> However, before I submit the final versions to ISO for publication, I’m
> giving WG4 (and Ecma TC45) members a chance to review the final drafts to
> make sure I applied all the edits correctly. In the case of Part 1, there
> are some 250 sets of edits. I don’t expect members to check all of them,
> but if each member randomly chose 10 of them and checked those, we’ll
> likely get good coverage.
>
>
>
> The changes are tracked, and both DOCX and PDF versions are included for
> each Part. Don’t be concerned if you see some bright blue edits, as they
> will be “fixed” when I finally adopt the tracked changes.
>
>
>
> Part 4 contains some manual pointers into Part 1, but these have not yet
> been updated. I will do that once Part 1’s tracked changes have been
> adopted, and that Part is frozen.
>
>
>
> I have posted to Livelink the 49-MB and 13-MB zip files as documents
> 2015-0309 and 2015-0310, respectively. Only registered members can access
> these.
>
>
>
> Rex Jaeschke, 29500 Project Editor
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
>
> Makoto
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
>
> Makoto
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
>
> Makoto
>

-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto

-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20150719/18e6a79b/attachment-0001.html>