PLEASE PROOF: Drafts of 29500-1/-4:2016; feedback due by the end of 2016-04-29

[MURATA Makoto]

The diagram in 17.4.10 in the Word version and that
in the PDF version look different.  The same discrepancy
appear in 17.4.11.

Regards,
Makoto

2016-04-12 6:59 GMT+09:00 caroline arms <caroline.arms at gmail.com>:

> Rex,
>
> Carrying on through Cor 1.
>
> Items 22-24 look OK
>
> Item 25 looks OK wrt Cor 1, but I'm suspicious there might be another
> problem.  Should "not to use the fidelity" be "not to lose the
> fidelity"?  If that is not what is meant, some clarification is
> probably in order.  The current wording is confusing.
>
> Items 26-34 look OK.
>
> Item 35.  Mostly OK, but missing an added space in ancestorstructured
> in xPath row in attributes table
>
> Items 36-39 look OK
>
> Item 40 looks OK, but I suspect a typo that was not noticed before.  I
> think "default gallery hall" should be "default gallery shall".
>
>
> Time for dinner.
>
>      Caroline
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:26 AM, caroline arms <caroline.arms at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Rex,
> >
> > Moving on to checking Part 1 draft against Cor 1  (Cor 3 in the DR Log).
> >
> > Items 1-4 look OK.
> >
> > Item 5 looks OK, but I think the inserted text could do with a link to
> > 18.2.10 for extLst
> >
> > Items 6-13 look OK.
> >
> > Item 14.  One insertion was missed, the comma after i.e.
> >
> > Items 15-16 look OK
> >
> > Item 17 looks OK, except:
> >   missed substitution of "1" for "on" in beforeAutospacing example
> >
> > Items 18-20 look OK
> >
> > Item 21 seems to have two problems
> > 1.  The cstheme row in table on page 303 has some extra periods
> > compared to Cor 1.
> >
> > 2.  This is not a problem with copying from Cor 1 to Part 1, but
> > applies to Cor 1 as well.  Unless I'm going blind (or am just confused
> > by Arabic scripts/fonts, which other readers may be), I am seeing two
> > instances of the same example markup that are explained to have
> > DIFFERENT results.
> >
> > The first instance is the first example in the subclause 17.3.2.26
> > <w:r>
> > <w:rPr>
> > <w:rFonts w:ascii="Courier New" w:cs="Times New Roman" />
> > </w:rPr>
> > <w:t>English العربية </w:t>
> > </w:r>
> >
> > followed by:
> > In this run, both “English” and “ العربية ” should be in ASCII font
> > slot, according to the two-step algorithm
> > below. Therefore, both of them should be in the Courier New font face.
> >
> > The second instance is immediately before the attributes table
> > <w:r>
> > <w:rPr>
> > <w:rFonts w:ascii="Courier New" w:cs="Times New Roman" />
> > </w:rPr>
> > <w:t>English العربية </w:t>
> > </w:r>
> >
> > followed by:
> > This text run must therefore use the Courier New font for all
> > characters in the range U+0000 to U+007F, and
> > must use the Times New Roman font for all characters in the Complex
> > Script range.
> >
> > I have managed to download DR 9-0040, but do not have time now to
> > follow it through to see if I can figure out when/why the duplication
> > appeared or which might be correct.
> >
> >    I'll try and get to some more of Cor 1 later today or tomorrow.
> >
> >    Caroline
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com>
> wrote:
> >> I just posted the following new documents to the WG4 website:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ·       N 0333: 29500-1:2016 in DOCX and PDF, schemas and other
> electronic
> >> annexes [61MB]
> >>
> >> ·       N 0334: 29500-4:2016 in DOCX and PDF, schemas [12MB]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> These documents are 29500-1/-4:2012 with CORs 1 and 2 applied.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Please post any corrections/suggestions to this list.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> About a year ago, we tried to publish 29500-1/-4:2015 after having
> >> incorporated COR1, but as we found errors, we produced a COR2. I built
> on
> >> last year’s work by simply applying COR2 to what we already had. That
> made
> >> some new changes and undid a few from COR1.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> For your convenience, CORs 1 and 2 are attached.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I have applied all the editorial corrections reported (especially those
> >> documented in the Beijing meeting minutes from 2015).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I updated the Part 4 pointers into Part 1 to reflect clause-number
> changes.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I’ve asked Murata-san to get me the latest schemas, but as nothing was
> >> changed in that regard for COR2, what I posted today should be the final
> >> schemas.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The review period ends on 2016-04-29. Hopefully, we can move these
> drafts to
> >> DIS ballots during the 2016-05-10 teleconference. We already got SC 34’s
> >> approval to do this at the Beijing Plenary. All being well, the ISO and
> Ecma
> >> editions will be published before year’s end.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Rex
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>



-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20160412/56a2f706/attachment.html>