DR 11-0029

[MURATA Makoto]

Aarti,

We certainly should go ahead.  But without knowing
which element of DSig 1.1 should be allowed
and which should be disallowed, we simply cannot
close this DR.  (We closed DR 11-0030 but
we cannot avoid the version issue and close DR 11-0029.)

At present, there are are very little expertise of digital
signature in WG4.  We do not even have examples,
which shows which element of DSig 1.0 is currently.
We also have to make sure that our decision
is implementable.  I am thus expecting slow progress
in this area.

Regards,
Makoto

2016-07-16 4:27 GMT+09:00 Aarti Nankani <Aarti.Nankani at microsoft.com>:

> Hello Murata-San,
>
>
>
> I was going over my notes from Prague and I recall we all agreed on the
> following for DR 11-0029: We will not discuss DSig1.1 with this DR as it's
> a separate issue and should not block fixing and closing this DR.
>
> Let me know if points 1, 3, 4 are written up as per our discussion, we
> should go ahead with resolving this DR.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Aarti
>
>
>
>
>



-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20160716/791ba75a/attachment.html>