DR 17-0034 - proposed change to prose

[Francis Cave]

I do not think that the term "math argument" needs to be defined, but I 
think it would be helpful to identify the elements that represent 
mathematical expressions in this category, and which can have <m:argPr> 
as a child element. I therefore propose the following change to the 
first paragraph of §22.1.2.5, as the simplest way of doing this:

    This element specifies any properties of the_a_ math argument. _The
    following elements represent math arguments: deg (§22.1.2.26), den
    (§22.1.2.28), e (§22.1.2.32), fName (§22.1.2.37), lim (§22.1.2.52),
    num (§22.1.2.75), sub (§22.1.2.112), sup (§22.1.2.114)._ [/Example/:
    The XML below represents the argSz attribute on the base element e
    of a box:

Incidentally, I have spotted more inconsistent drafting in §22.1.2: 
"Border-Box object" vs "Border Box object" (§22.1.2.11 and §22.1.2.12); 
"Box object" vs "box object" (§22.1.2.13 and §22.1.2.15). These are 
minor nits.

Francis

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20180308/acfd1031/attachment.html>