Notes on WD3.5 for OPC

[caroline arms]

Rex, Murata-san, et al.,

Here is my suggested rewording for the paragraph about relationship
identifiers:

Relationships have relationship identifiers (term 3.2.15). These
identifiers allow relationships to be distinguished from one another. An
identifier can also be used to associate the target of a relationship with
a specific point in a source part (for example, to represent a hyperlink),
by embedding the relationship identifier at that point.

    I hope you have a good meeting with the OPC experts.  I'm sorry I can't
listen in.

    Thanks.  Caroline

On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 12:33 PM, caroline arms <caroline.arms at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Murata-san, Rex,
>
> Attached are notes from my reading of the latest draft for OPC.  I can't
> guarantee to have read every word, but it was fairly thorough.
>
> Most suggestions are editorial, but I did run into a few questions/issues
> that may have more substance.
>
> Removing the schema text from Annex C has created problems for lots of
> links.  Links in Annex don't function for me.  Most links to schemas in
> Annex C are now non-functional or unhelpful.  My notes mention a few
> examples but are not comprehensive on that point.
>
> I will hope to call in tomorrow for the afternoon session.  Please send
> email letting me know when you plan to re-assemble after lunch.  I will be
> driving between Ithaca and Bethesda and ignoring my phone. Asynchronous
> communication is better.  I will stop and send email if it looks as though
> I am not going to be available by 1pm Seattle time (4pm Eastern).
>
>      Thanks.  Caroline
>


This message has been scanned for malware by Forcepoint. www.forcepoint.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20180910/01870a69/attachment.html>