DR-19-0015: "DML: Meaningless examples in Styles section"

[caroline arms]

Francis,

Your suggestion seems good to me.  It would be great to have examples that
Office would actually produce today.

The following subclauses are for the 6 options.  They have examples which
might help.

20.1.2.3.13 hslClr (Hue, Saturation, Luminance Color Model)
20.1.2.3.22 prstClr (Preset Color)
20.1.2.3.30 scrgbClr (RGB Color Model - Percentage Variant)
20.1.2.3.32 srgbClr (RGB Color Model - Hex Variant)
20.1.2.3.33 sysClr (System Color)
20.1.2.3.29 schemeClr (Scheme Color)

I agree that the markup for individual accent colors don't interact in a
normative way.  There are just several ways for a user to pick a color and
the choice of color specification might reflect the way they did it for the
individual accents.  Or an application might choose to always use a
particular form for the 3 direct specifications.

      Regards,   Caroline

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:04 AM Francis Cave <francis at franciscave.com>
wrote:

> Caroline, Murata-san
>
>
>
> I agree with Caroline’s suggestion that the example is not worth
> repeating. However, if the example actually included one or more code
> fragments showing different ways of defining the colors in a theme, this
> might actually be useful. Personally, I consider the coloured bars image
> worse than useless, because it conveys no information at all but hints that
> the colors might be grouped or interact in some normative way that I don’t
> believe is the case, so might confuse implementers.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Francis
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* caroline arms <caroline.arms at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* 28 February 2019 14:00
> *To:* MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp>
> *Cc:* SC 34 WG4 <e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org>
> *Subject:* Re: DR-19-0015: "DML: Meaningless examples in Styles section"
>
>
>
> Murata-san,
>
>
>
> I think it can be any of the elements.  They are different ways a color
> can be specified.  The first 3 options are direct ways to specify a color
> (2 variants of RGB, and HSL).  I assume the other 3 use references (via a
> name or index) to colors within sets already defined.
>
>
>
>     Caroline
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 8:19 AM MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp>
> wrote:
>
> The accent1 element contains one of the following elements:
>
>
>
> element scrgbClr { a_CT_ScRgbColor }
>
>   | element srgbClr { a_CT_SRgbColor }
>
>   | element hslClr { a_CT_HslColor }
>
>   | element sysClr { a_CT_SystemColor }
>
>   | element schemeClr { a_CT_SchemeColor }
>
>   | element prstClr { a_CT_PresetColor }
>
>
>
> I do not understand the current example.  Which of these six
>
> elements is intended?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Makoto
>
>
>
> 2019年2月28日(木) 21:44 caroline arms <caroline.arms at gmail.com>:
>
> I agree with Francis that there is no value to repeating the same example
> diagram twelve times.  My suggestion would be  to have the diagram appear
> only in the subclause with the first occurrence [ 20.1.4.1.1 ] .  I would
> also suggest changing the text for all twelve subclauses.  The reference to
> "*the* set of twelve colors" is odd.
>
>
>
> Suggested change for  20.1.4.1.1
>
> This element defines a color that happens to be the accent 1 color. The
> set of twelve colors come together to
> form the color scheme for a theme.
>
> This element defines a color to be the accent 1 color, one of a set of
> twelve colors that
> form the color scheme for a theme.
>
>
>
> The other clauses would have equivalent text but no diagram.
>
>
>
>    My two cents!
>
>
>
>    Caroline
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 8:09 PM Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> This message has been scanned for malware by Forcepoint.
> www.forcepoint.com
>
>
>
> Click here
> <https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/dM64fKa2DR3GX2PQPOmvUnd1S5HUtV8BOkqkSSZRljTYLOsyJ-WcCv5oH0WlTVNCJaBnK_EicyuSPFO0UaI8cQ==>
> to report this email as spam.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
>
> Makoto
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20190228/4b372a5b/attachment-0001.html>